Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Reports Solid Results for 2016, Announces Share Repurchase Program and the Acquisition of the Don CeSar
02/22/2017
| OPERATING RESULTS | |||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except per share and hotel statistics) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Quarter ended December 31, | Percent | Year ended December 31, | Percent | ||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | Change | 2016 | 2015 | Change | ||||||||||||||
| Total revenues | $ | 1,337 | $ | 1,326 | 0.8 | % | $ | 5,430 | $ | 5,350 | 1.5 | % | |||||||
| Comparable hotel revenues (1) | 1,217 | 1,194 | 1.9 | % | 4,908 | 4,776 | 2.8 | % | |||||||||||
| Net income | 128 | 165 | (22.4 | )% | 771 | 565 | 36.5 | % | |||||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA (1) | 348 | 344 | 1.2 | % | 1,471 | 1,409 | 4.4 | % | |||||||||||
| Change in comparable hotel RevPAR: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Domestic properties | 2.1 | % | 2.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
| International properties - Constant US$ |
(9.5 | )% | 7.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Total - Constant US$ | 1.7 | % | 2.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings per share | 0.17 | 0.22 | (22.7 | )% | 1.02 | 0.74 | 37.8 | % | |||||||||||
| NAREIT FFO per diluted share (1) | 0.41 | 0.37 | 10.8 | % | 1.69 | 1.49 | 13.4 | % | |||||||||||
| Adjusted FFO per diluted share (1) | 0.41 | 0.39 | 5.1 | % | 1.69 | 1.54 | 9.7 | % | |||||||||||
| ___________ | |||||||||||||||||||
(1) NAREIT Funds From Operations (“FFO”) per diluted share, Adjusted FFO per diluted share, Adjusted EBITDA and comparable hotel results are non-GAAP (U.S. generally accepted accounting principles) financial measures within the meaning of the rules of the
GAAP OPERATING PERFORMANCE
“We saw outstanding margin improvement in both the fourth quarter and full year,” said
- Net income decreased $37 million for the fourth quarter resulting from a decrease in gain on sale of assets and equity in earnings of affiliates which was partially offset by a decrease in debt extinguishment costs. For the full year, net income increased $206 million, primarily due to the $158 million increase in gain on sale of assets, operating profit growth and a reduction in interest expense, which included
$41 million of debt extinguishment costs in 2015 that did not repeat in 2016. The improvement in RevPAR helped drive GAAP operating profit margin growth of 40 basis points and 80 basis points for the quarter and the full year, respectively. - Diluted earnings per share decreased by 22.7% and increased by 37.8% for the quarter and the full year, respectively, as a result of this activity and the repurchase of approximately 14 million shares in 2016 and 52 million shares over the past 20 months.
- Total revenues increased 0.8% for the quarter and 1.5% for the full year. The growth was driven by rooms and food & beverage revenue, partially offset by lost revenue from hotel dispositions.
ADDITIONAL KEY COMPANY METRICS
- Comparable hotel EBITDA improved $14 million, or 4.3%, for the quarter and $75 million, or 5.8%, for the full year driven by strong comparable hotel EBITDA margin improvement of 65 basis points for the quarter and 80 basis points for the full year. Group performance drove comparable revenue growth of 1.9% and 2.8% for the quarter and full year, respectively. The full year comparable hotel EBITDA margins exclude the
$12 million gain from the business interruption proceeds received due to the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. However, the gain is included in Adjusted EBITDA discussed below. - The improvement in comparable hotel EBITDA led to an increase in Adjusted EBITDA of
$4 million for the quarter and $62 million for the full year, despite a net reduction due to property transactions, including the European joint venture’s 2015 hotel dispositions. - Comparable RevPAR on a constant dollar basis improved 1.7% for the quarter due to a 0.6% increase in average room rate and an 80 basis point increase in occupancy to 75.0%. For the full year, comparable RevPAR on a constant dollar basis increased 2.7%, driven by a 1.0% increase in average room rate and a 130 basis point increase in occupancy. For both the fourth quarter and full year, RevPAR growth was driven by strength in group demand. However, the growth in group business was partially offset by a decline in corporate transient business, due to weakness in business travel during the year.
- Comparable RevPAR at the Company’s domestic properties improved 2.1% for the quarter. The
San Diego ,Phoenix ,Los Angeles andWashington, D.C. markets outperformed the portfolio during the fourth quarter, with RevPAR increases of 12%, 8.3%, 8.1%, and 7.8%, respectively. The Company’sHouston andFlorida properties lagged the portfolio, with RevPAR decreases for the quarter of 4.9% and 4.7%, respectively, as both markets were affected by increased supply. For the full year, the Company’s comparable RevPAR for its domestic properties increased 2.5%. - On a constant dollar basis, RevPAR at the Company’s comparable international properties decreased 9.5% in the fourth quarter primarily as a result of the 22% decrease in the Company’s
Latin America markets due to political uncertainty and continued Zika virus fears inBrazil . For the full year, RevPAR for the Company’s comparable international properties increased 7.8%, primarily due to the 15.2% increase in theLatin America market, which benefited from the Summer Olympic and Paralympic games inRio de Janeiro . - As a result of the improvements in operating results described above and the Company’s share repurchase program, described below, Adjusted FFO per share increased 5.1% and 9.7% for the quarter and full year, respectively.
CAPITAL ALLOCATION
On
"We are excited to add one of the ‘Grand Dame’ Floridian resorts on one of the best beaches in the country to our portfolio. The iconic Don CeSar is exactly the type of irreplaceable asset we look to add to our collection of hotels and it will be one of our top 20 properties in terms of RevPAR. In addition, we believe there are significant value-added opportunities at the property through aggressive asset management, the installation of
The Company continued to strategically dispose of assets where it expects lower growth and/or higher capital expenditures requirements. Proceeds from the sales of these assets during the year were utilized to repurchase stock, capital expenditures and other corporate initiatives. Subsequent to year end, the Company sold the
| Sales Price | Mortgage Debt Repayment |
Sales Price Net of Mortgage Debt |
||||||||||
| First Quarter Sales (three hotels) | $ | 121 | $ | 20 | $ | 101 | ||||||
| Second Quarter Sales (five hotels) | 345 | — | 345 | |||||||||
| Third Quarter Sales (two hotels) | 31 | 17 | 14 | |||||||||
| Total 2016 Sales | $ | 497 | $ | 37 | $ | 460 | ||||||
| Year-to-date 2017 Sales | ||||||||||||
| JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort & Spa | $ | 172 | $ | — | $ | 172 | ||||||
| $ | 669 | $ | 37 | $ | 632 | |||||||
SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM, DIVIDENDS AND SPECIAL DIVIDENDS
Over the past 12 months, the Company has distributed approximately
The Company is committed to maintaining a meaningful dividend, subject to approval by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company paid a regular quarterly cash dividend of
The Company repurchased 0.7 million shares at an average price of
On February 21, 2017, the Board of Directors authorized a new program to repurchase up to $500 million of common stock. The common stock may be purchased from time to time, depending upon market conditions, and may be purchased in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions or by other means, including through one or more trading plans designed to comply with Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The number of shares purchased will also depend upon operating results, funds generated by sales activity, dividends that may be required by those sales and investment options that may be available, including reinvesting in the portfolio or acquiring new hotels, as well as maintaining the Company’s strong leverage position. The program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any specific number of shares and may be suspended at any time at its discretion.
BALANCE SHEET
The Company’s strong balance sheet remains a key competitive advantage, providing flexibility to take advantage of investment opportunities throughout the lodging cycle. An important component of this strategy is the Company’s investment-grade rating on its long-term unsecured debt and its revolving credit facility and term loans, which represent 98% of the Company’s outstanding borrowings.
At December 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $372 million of cash and
REDEVELOPMENT AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT (“ROI”) CAPITAL PROJECTS
The Company invested approximately $39 million and $226 million in the fourth quarter and full year, respectively, on redevelopment and ROI capital expenditures, representing a decrease of
The Company’s ROI projects included:
- The completion of the final phase of the renovation of the Denver Marriott Tech Center, including newly designed guestrooms, additional meeting and public space, and a new concept restaurant. The project includes sustainability features such as LED lighting in guestrooms and public spaces, new energy-efficient HVAC units in guestrooms and high efficiency hot water and boiler plant upgrades.
- The completion of the first phase of the two-year renovation project at The Phoenician, including a redesign of the guest rooms and canyon suites and update to the façade. The second phase of the project is expected to be completed in 2017 and includes a complete redesign and renovation of the main public areas, pools, a restaurant and newly constructed spa and fitness building.
For full-year 2017, the Company expects to invest a total of approximately $90 million to $115 million in redevelopment projects and ROI capital expenditures. Additional information regarding the Company’s capital projects can be found at www.hosthotels.com.
RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT EXPENDITURES
The Company invested approximately $75 million and $293 million in the fourth quarter and full year, respectively, in renewal and replacement capital expenditures, representing a decrease of
EUROPEAN JOINT VENTURE
The European joint venture’s comparable hotel RevPAR on a constant euro basis declined approximately 1.1% and 2.0% for the fourth quarter and full year, respectively. The decrease in comparable hotel RevPAR was a result of slow economic growth and uncertain political climate that reduced demand, particularly at the joint venture’s properties in
2017 OUTLOOK
For 2017, there is cautious optimism that business investment, and, therefore, corporate travel, will benefit from business-friendly policies, such as a potential decrease in corporate tax rates and regulations, and an increase in infrastructure spending. However, the effect and timing of any of these initiatives is unknown. At the same time, the lodging industry expects to continue to experience above average supply growth, particularly in the major markets where the Company competes. It also remains to be seen what effect the new administration’s immigration and travel policies will have on international travel to
| Full Year 2017 | ||||||
| Low-end of range |
High-end of range |
|||||
| Total comparable hotel RevPAR - Constant US$ | 0.0 | % | 2.0 | % | ||
| Total revenues under GAAP | (1.5 | )% | 0.3 | % | ||
| Operating profit margin under GAAP | (60 bps) | 50 bps | ||||
| Comparable hotel EBITDA margins | (80 bps) | 0 bps | ||||
Based upon the above parameters, the Company estimates its 2017 guidance as follows (in millions, except per share amounts):
| Full Year 2017 | ||||||||
| Low-end of range |
High-end of range |
|||||||
| Earnings per diluted share | $ | .63 | $ | .72 | ||||
| Net income | 469 | 539 | ||||||
| NAREIT FFO per diluted share | 1.60 | 1.69 | ||||||
| Adjusted FFO per diluted share | 1.60 | 1.70 | ||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | 1,420 | 1,490 | ||||||
See the 2017 Forecast Schedules and the Notes to Financial Information for other assumptions used in the forecasts and items that may affect forecast results.
ABOUT HOST HOTELS & RESORTS
Host Hotels &
Note: This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities regulations. These forward-looking statements include forecast results and are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “should,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “will,” “continue” and other similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions and forecasts of future results. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results to differ materially from those anticipated at the time the forward-looking statements are made. These risks include, but are not limited to: changes in national and local economic and business conditions and other factors such as natural disasters, pandemics and weather that will affect occupancy rates at our hotels and the demand for hotel products and services; the impact of geopolitical developments outside the U.S. on lodging demand; volatility in global financial and credit markets; operating risks associated with the hotel business; risks and limitations in our operating flexibility associated with the level of our indebtedness and our ability to meet covenants in our debt agreements; risks associated with our relationships with property managers and joint venture partners; our ability to maintain our properties in a first-class manner, including meeting capital expenditure requirements; the effects of hotel renovations on our hotel occupancy and financial results; our ability to compete effectively in areas such as access, location, quality of accommodations and room rate structures; risks associated with our ability to complete acquisitions and dispositions and develop new properties and the risks that acquisitions and new developments may not perform in accordance with our expectations; our ability to continue to satisfy complex rules in order for us to remain a REIT for federal income tax purposes; risks associated with our ability to effectuate our dividend policy, including factors such as operating results and the economic outlook influencing our board’s decision whether to pay further dividends at levels previously disclosed or to use available cash to make special dividends; and other risks and uncertainties associated with our business described in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K filed with the
* This press release contains registered trademarks that are the exclusive property of their respective owners. None of the owners of these trademarks has any responsibility or liability for any information contained in this press release.
*** Tables to Follow ***
Host Hotels &
| HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Consolidated Balance Sheets (1) (in millions, except shares and per share amounts) |
||||||||
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| Property and equipment, net | $ | 10,145 | $ | 10,583 | ||||
| Assets held for sale | 150 | 55 | ||||||
| Due from managers | 55 | 56 | ||||||
| Advances to and investments in affiliates | 286 | 324 | ||||||
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement fund | 173 | 141 | ||||||
| Other | 225 | 261 | ||||||
| Restricted cash | 2 | 15 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 372 | 221 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 11,408 | $ | 11,656 | ||||
| LIABILITIES, NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS AND EQUITY | ||||||||
| Debt | ||||||||
| Senior notes | $ | 2,380 | $ | 2,376 | ||||
| Credit facility, including the term loans of $997 million and $996 million, respectively |
1,206 | 1,291 | ||||||
| Mortgage debt | 63 | 200 | ||||||
| Total debt | 3,649 | 3,867 | ||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 278 | 243 | ||||||
| Other | 283 | 299 | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 4,210 | 4,409 | ||||||
| Non-controlling interests - Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P | 165 | 143 | ||||||
| Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
| Common stock, par value $.01, 1,050 million shares authorized, 737.8 million shares and 750.3 million shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
7 | 8 | ||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 8,077 | 8,302 | ||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (83 | ) | (107 | ) | ||||
| Deficit | (1,007 | ) | (1,139 | ) | ||||
| Total equity of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. stockholders | 6,994 | 7,064 | ||||||
| Non-controlling interests—other consolidated partnerships | 39 | 40 | ||||||
| Total equity | 7,033 | 7,104 | ||||||
| Total liabilities, non-controlling interests and equity | $ | 11,408 | $ | 11,656 | ||||
| ___________ | ||||||||
(1) Our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 has been prepared without audit. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP have been omitted.
| HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Consolidated Statements of Operations (1) (unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||||||
| Quarter ended December 31, | Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
| Revenues | ||||||||||||||||
| Rooms | $ | 837 | $ | 840 | $ | 3,492 | $ | 3,465 | ||||||||
| Food and beverage | 416 | 408 | 1,599 | 1,568 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 84 | 78 | 339 | 317 | ||||||||||||
| Total revenues | 1,337 | 1,326 | 5,430 | 5,350 | ||||||||||||
| Expenses | ||||||||||||||||
| Rooms | 219 | 221 | 893 | 902 | ||||||||||||
| Food and beverage | 284 | 280 | 1,114 | 1,110 | ||||||||||||
| Other departmental and support expenses | 325 | 322 | 1,306 | 1,295 | ||||||||||||
| Management fees | 59 | 55 | 236 | 226 | ||||||||||||
| Other property-level expenses | 93 | 97 | 382 | 386 | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 183 | 180 | 724 | 708 | ||||||||||||
| Corporate and other expenses(2) | 24 | 26 | 106 | 94 | ||||||||||||
| (Gain) loss on insurance and business interruption settlements | — | 2 | (15 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
| Total operating costs and expenses | 1,187 | 1,183 | 4,746 | 4,719 | ||||||||||||
| Operating profit | 150 | 143 | 684 | 631 | ||||||||||||
| Interest income | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense(3) | (38 | ) | (60 | ) | (154 | ) | (227 | ) | ||||||||
| Gain on sale of assets | 8 | 33 | 253 | 95 | ||||||||||||
| Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and derivatives |
3 | (2 | ) | 4 | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
| Equity in earnings of affiliates | 2 | 45 | 21 | 76 | ||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 126 | 161 | 811 | 574 | ||||||||||||
| Benefit (provision) for income taxes | 2 | 4 | (40 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net income | 128 | 165 | 771 | 565 | ||||||||||||
| Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (9 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||
| Net income attributable to Host Inc. | $ | 126 | $ | 163 | $ | 762 | $ | 558 | ||||||||
| Basic earnings per common share | $ | .17 | $ | .22 | $ | 1.03 | $ | .74 | ||||||||
| Diluted earnings per common share | $ | .17 | $ | .22 | $ | 1.02 | $ | .74 | ||||||||
(1) Our consolidated statements of operations presented above have been prepared without audit. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP have been omitted.
(2) Corporate and other expenses include the following items:
| Quarter ended December 31, | Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
| General and administrative costs | $ | 21 | $ | 24 | $ | 95 | $ | 87 | ||||||||
| Non-cash stock-based compensation expense | 4 | 2 | 12 | 11 | ||||||||||||
| Litigation (recoveries)/accruals and acquisition costs, net | (1 | ) | — | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 24 | $ | 26 | $ | 106 | $ | 94 | ||||||||
(3) Interest expense includes the following items:
| Quarter ended December 31, | Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
| Non-cash interest for exchangeable debentures | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 13 | ||||||||
| Debt extinguishment costs | — | 20 | — | 41 | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | — | $ | 20 | $ | — | $ | 54 | ||||||||
| HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Earnings per Common Share (unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||||||
| Quarter ended December 31, | Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 128 | $ | 165 | $ | 771 | $ | 565 | ||||||||
| Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (9 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||
| Net income attributable to Host Inc | 126 | 163 | 762 | 558 | ||||||||||||
| Assuming conversion of exchangeable senior debentures |
— | 1 | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Diluted income attributable to Host Inc | $ | 126 | $ | 164 | $ | 762 | $ | 558 | ||||||||
| Basic weighted average shares outstanding | 737.9 | 753.2 | 743.0 | 752.4 | ||||||||||||
| Assuming weighted average shares for conversion of exchangeable senior debentures |
— | 8.2 | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Assuming distribution of common shares granted under the comprehensive stock plans, less shares assumed purchased at market |
.7 | .5 | .7 | .5 | ||||||||||||
| Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (1) | 738.6 | 761.9 | 743.7 | 752.9 | ||||||||||||
| Basic earnings per common share | $ | .17 | $ | .22 | $ | 1.03 | $ | .74 | ||||||||
| Diluted earnings per common share | $ | .17 | $ | .22 | $ | 1.02 | $ | .74 | ||||||||
| ___________ | ||||||||||||||||
(1) Dilutive securities may include shares granted under comprehensive stock plans, preferred operating partnership units (“OP Units”) held by minority partners, exchangeable debt securities and other non-controlling interests that have the option to convert their limited partnership interests to common OP Units. No effect is shown for any securities that were anti-dilutive for the period.
Comparable Hotels by Market in Constant US$
| As of December 31, 2016 | Quarter ended December 31, 2016 | Quarter ended December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market (2) | No. of Properties |
No. of Rooms |
Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Percent Change in RevPAR |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Boston | 4 | 3,185 | $ | 228.87 | 74.5 | % | $ | 170.44 | $ | 227.65 | 75.8 | % | $ | 172.64 | (1.3 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 8 | 6,960 | 314.29 | 89.4 | 280.85 | 324.20 | 88.7 | 287.67 | (2.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Washington, D.C | 12 | 6,023 | 210.91 | 73.3 | 154.59 | 203.64 | 70.4 | 143.40 | 7.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Atlanta | 5 | 1,939 | 196.33 | 74.1 | 145.41 | 196.49 | 72.7 | 142.90 | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Florida | 8 | 4,559 | 219.59 | 66.8 | 146.74 | 221.57 | 69.5 | 154.00 | (4.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chicago | 6 | 2,392 | 207.67 | 77.1 | 160.02 | 200.57 | 75.0 | 150.42 | 6.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Denver | 2 | 735 | 175.13 | 66.0 | 115.56 | 173.40 | 64.4 | 111.74 | 3.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Houston | 3 | 1,143 | 184.19 | 69.6 | 128.15 | 196.59 | 68.6 | 134.82 | (4.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Phoenix | 3 | 1,241 | 209.96 | 70.0 | 146.96 | 203.74 | 66.6 | 135.64 | 8.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Seattle | 2 | 1,315 | 203.96 | 69.3 | 141.43 | 193.39 | 73.1 | 141.33 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| San Francisco | 4 | 2,912 | 249.50 | 78.9 | 196.77 | 254.43 | 76.5 | 194.76 | 1.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Los Angeles | 7 | 2,843 | 190.32 | 78.7 | 149.81 | 179.93 | 77.1 | 138.64 | 8.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| San Diego | 3 | 2,981 | 195.83 | 78.8 | 154.39 | 190.54 | 72.4 | 137.91 | 12.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hawaii | 3 | 1,682 | 345.52 | 88.1 | 304.28 | 325.04 | 87.2 | 283.49 | 7.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 11 | 7,270 | 173.02 | 66.2 | 114.59 | 168.28 | 65.5 | 110.26 | 3.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Domestic | 81 | 47,180 | 229.56 | 75.4 | 173.09 | 228.08 | 74.3 | 169.48 | 2.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asia-Pacific | 1 | 384 | $ | 225.34 | 91.3 | % | $ | 205.69 | $ | 223.51 | 92.5 | % | $ | 206.83 | (0.6 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Canada | 2 | 849 | 160.36 | 64.3 | 103.15 | 162.86 | 62.4 | 101.55 | 1.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Latin America | 4 | 963 | 194.20 | 55.7 | 108.17 | 199.67 | 69.5 | 138.76 | (22.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| International | 7 | 2,196 | 189.19 | 65.4 | 123.73 | 192.80 | 70.9 | 136.66 | (9.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All Markets - Constant US$ |
88 | 49,376 | 227.98 | 75.0 | 170.88 | 226.57 | 74.2 | 168.01 | 1.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Owned Hotels in Constant US$ (3)
| As of December 31, 2016 | Quarter ended December 31, 2016 | Quarter ended December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No. of Properties |
No. of Rooms |
Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Percent Change in RevPAR |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comparable Hotels | 88 | 49,376 | $ | 227.98 | 75.0 | % | $ | 170.88 | $ | 226.57 | 74.2 | % | $ | 168.01 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-comparable Hotels (Pro forma) | 8 | 4,790 | 211.03 | 65.8 | 138.75 | 212.01 | 55.1 | 116.77 | 18.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All Hotels | 96 | 54,166 | 226.65 | 74.1 | 168.04 | 225.60 | 72.5 | 163.49 | 2.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparable Hotels in Nominal US$
| As of December 31, 2016 | Quarter ended December 31, 2016 | Quarter ended December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No. of Properties |
No. of Rooms |
Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Percent Change in RevPAR |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asia-Pacific | 1 | 384 | $ | 225.34 | 91.3 | % | $ | 205.69 | $ | 214.38 | 92.5 | % | $ | 198.38 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Canada | 2 | 849 | 160.36 | 64.3 | 103.15 | 163.50 | 62.4 | 101.95 | 1.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Latin America | 4 | 963 | 194.20 | 55.7 | 108.17 | 197.03 | 69.5 | 136.93 | (21.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| International | 7 | 2,196 | 189.19 | 65.4 | 123.73 | 189.75 | 70.9 | 134.50 | (8.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Domestic | 81 | 47,180 | 229.56 | 75.4 | 173.09 | 228.08 | 74.3 | 169.48 | 2.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All Markets | 88 | 49,376 | 227.98 | 75.0 | 170.88 | 226.44 | 74.2 | 167.91 | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparable Hotels by Type in Nominal US$
| As of December 31, 2016 | Quarter ended December 31, 2016 | Quarter ended December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Property type (2) | No. of Properties |
No. of Rooms |
Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Percent Change in RevPAR |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Urban | 52 | 32,655 | $ | 233.36 | 77.1 | % | $ | 180.03 | $ | 234.51 | 76.7 | % | $ | 179.82 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Suburban | 19 | 6,947 | 190.47 | 68.4 | 130.31 | 185.16 | 66.7 | 123.47 | 5.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Resort | 11 | 7,102 | 271.09 | 68.5 | 185.80 | 259.77 | 66.8 | 173.57 | 7.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Airport | 6 | 2,672 | 151.88 | 82.2 | 124.78 | 149.46 | 82.2 | 122.83 | 1.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All Types | 88 | 49,376 | 227.98 | 75.0 | 170.88 | 226.44 | 74.2 | 167.91 | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparable Hotels by Market in Constant US$
| As of December 31, 2016 | Year ended December 31, 2016 | Year ended December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market (2) | No. of Properties |
No. of Rooms |
Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Percent Change in RevPAR |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Boston | 4 | 3,185 | $ | 231.16 | 80.2 | % | $ | 185.42 | $ | 228.47 | 79.6 | % | $ | 181.85 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 8 | 6,960 | 280.29 | 87.2 | 244.36 | 291.61 | 86.4 | 251.95 | (3.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Washington, D.C | 12 | 6,023 | 212.11 | 78.0 | 165.53 | 205.52 | 75.5 | 155.16 | 6.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Atlanta | 5 | 1,939 | 193.33 | 78.0 | 150.86 | 189.83 | 75.7 | 143.73 | 5.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Florida | 8 | 4,559 | 228.28 | 73.3 | 167.41 | 226.52 | 74.5 | 168.84 | (0.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chicago | 6 | 2,392 | 203.33 | 77.4 | 157.43 | 202.05 | 75.7 | 152.87 | 3.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Denver | 2 | 735 | 179.94 | 73.5 | 132.25 | 175.63 | 72.8 | 127.88 | 3.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Houston | 3 | 1,143 | 196.50 | 71.3 | 140.14 | 204.14 | 69.4 | 141.65 | (1.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Phoenix | 3 | 1,241 | 215.97 | 71.1 | 153.51 | 210.15 | 71.1 | 149.42 | 2.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Seattle | 2 | 1,315 | 221.43 | 78.7 | 174.27 | 216.74 | 80.7 | 174.96 | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| San Francisco | 4 | 2,912 | 261.08 | 83.2 | 217.23 | 253.52 | 83.2 | 210.81 | 3.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Los Angeles | 7 | 2,843 | 202.53 | 83.1 | 168.24 | 191.74 | 80.7 | 154.70 | 8.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| San Diego | 3 | 2,981 | 206.98 | 84.2 | 174.35 | 201.70 | 82.0 | 165.31 | 5.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hawaii | 3 | 1,682 | 330.98 | 90.6 | 299.86 | 323.10 | 88.7 | 286.48 | 4.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 11 | 7,270 | 173.57 | 70.8 | 122.96 | 168.97 | 68.2 | 115.19 | 6.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Domestic | 81 | 47,180 | 226.07 | 79.0 | 178.61 | 224.23 | 77.7 | 174.18 | 2.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asia-Pacific | 1 | 384 | $ | 210.27 | 89.6 | % | $ | 188.39 | $ | 211.25 | 89.5 | % | $ | 189.09 | (0.4 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Canada | 2 | 849 | 170.79 | 64.0 | 109.29 | 171.84 | 60.5 | 103.98 | 5.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Latin America | 4 | 963 | 217.01 | 63.8 | 138.35 | 188.71 | 63.6 | 120.06 | 15.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| International | 7 | 2,196 | 198.82 | 68.5 | 136.15 | 188.26 | 67.1 | 126.27 | 7.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All Markets - Constant US$ |
88 | 49,376 | 225.01 | 78.5 | 176.71 | 222.83 | 77.2 | 172.04 | 2.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Owned Hotels in Constant US$ (3)
| As of December 31, 2016 | Year ended December 31, 2016 | Year ended December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No. of Properties |
No. of Rooms |
Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Percent Change in RevPAR |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comparable Hotels | 88 | 49,376 | $ | 225.01 | 78.5 | % | $ | 176.71 | $ | 222.83 | 77.2 | % | $ | 172.04 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-comparable Hotels (Pro forma) | 8 | 4,790 | 218.98 | 67.3 | 147.30 | 216.32 | 65.3 | 141.29 | 4.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All Hotels | 96 | 54,166 | 224.55 | 77.5 | 174.11 | 222.34 | 76.2 | 169.33 | 2.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparable Hotels in Nominal US$
| As of December 31, 2016 | Year ended December 31, 2016 | Year ended December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No. of Properties |
No. of Rooms |
Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Percent Change in RevPAR |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asia-Pacific | 1 | 384 | $ | 210.27 | 89.6 | % | $ | 188.39 | $ | 213.04 | 89.5 | % | $ | 190.69 | (1.2 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Canada | 2 | 849 | 170.79 | 64.0 | 109.29 | 177.16 | 60.5 | 107.20 | 1.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Latin America | 4 | 963 | 217.01 | 63.8 | 138.35 | 206.48 | 63.6 | 131.37 | 5.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| International | 7 | 2,196 | 198.82 | 68.5 | 136.15 | 197.89 | 67.1 | 132.73 | 2.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Domestic | 81 | 47,180 | 226.07 | 79.0 | 178.61 | 224.23 | 77.7 | 174.18 | 2.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All Markets | 88 | 49,376 | 225.01 | 78.5 | 176.71 | 223.21 | 77.2 | 172.33 | 2.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparable Hotels by Type in Nominal US$
| As of December 31, 2016 | Year ended December 31, 2016 | Year ended December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Property type (2) | No. of Properties |
No. of Rooms |
Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Percent Change in RevPAR |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Urban | 52 | 32,655 | $ | 227.71 | 80.4 | % | $ | 182.97 | $ | 227.69 | 79.0 | % | $ | 179.76 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Suburban | 19 | 6,947 | 195.55 | 73.2 | 143.18 | 189.12 | 72.1 | 136.35 | 5.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Resort | 11 | 7,102 | 269.97 | 72.7 | 196.32 | 263.97 | 72.3 | 190.79 | 2.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Airport | 6 | 2,672 | 158.03 | 85.5 | 135.14 | 153.18 | 82.3 | 126.01 | 7.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All Types | 88 | 49,376 | 225.01 | 78.5 | 176.71 | 223.21 | 77.2 | 172.33 | 2.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ___________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) See the Notes to Financial Information for a discussion of comparable hotel operating statistics and constant US$ presentation. Nominal US$ results include the effect of currency fluctuations, consistent with our financial statement presentation.
(2) See the Notes to Financial Information for a description of these markets and property types.
(3) Operating statistics are presented for all consolidated properties owned as of December 31, 2016 and do not include the results of operations for properties sold in 2016 or 2015. Additionally, all owned hotel operating statistics include hotels that we did not own for the entirety of the periods presented and properties that are undergoing large-scale capital projects during the periods presented and, therefore, are not considered comparable hotel information upon which we usually evaluate our performance. Specifically, comparable RevPAR is calculated as revenues divided by the available room nights, which will rarely vary on a year-over-year basis. Conversely, the available room nights included in the non-comparable RevPAR statistic will vary widely based on the timing of hotel closings, the scope of a capital project, or the development of a new property. As a result, the RevPAR increase of 2.8% for both the quarter and full year 2016, respectively, for the 96 hotels owned as of
- Non-comparable hotels - This represents seven hotels under significant renovations in either 2015 or 2016:
The Camby Hotel , The Logan,Axiom Hotel , theHouston Airport Marriott at George Bush Intercontinental, theHyatt Regency San Francisco Airport , the Denver Marriott Tech Center, and theMarriott Marquis San Diego Marina . It also includes The Phoenician, acquired inJune 2015 , which is presented on a pro forma basis assuming we owned the hotel as ofJanuary 1, 2015 and includes historical operating data for periods prior to our ownership. As a result, the RevPAR increase of 18.8% and 4.3% for the quarter and full year 2016, respectively, for these eight hotels is considered non-comparable.
| HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Hotel Operating Data – European Joint Venture |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| As of December 31, 2016 | Quarter ended December 31, 2016 | Quarter ended December 31, 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No. of Properties |
No. of Rooms |
Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Percent Change in RevPAR |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comparable - in Constant Euros (1) |
10 | 3,896 | € | 199.08 | 72.0 | % | € | 143.33 | € | 199.49 | 72.7 | % | € | 144.98 | (1.1 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total comparable - in Nominal Euros (1) |
10 | 3,896 | 199.08 | 72.0 | 143.33 | 205.53 | 72.7 | 149.38 | (4.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| As of December 31, 2016 | Year ended December 31, 2016 | Year ended December 31, 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No. of Properties |
No. of Rooms |
Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Average Room Rate |
Average Occupancy Percentage |
RevPAR | Percent Change in RevPAR |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comparable - in Constant Euros (1) |
10 | 3,896 | € | 213.47 | 73.7 | % | € | 157.30 | € | 206.18 | 77.9 | % | € | 160.55 | (2.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total comparable - in Nominal Euros (1) |
10 | 3,896 | 213.47 | 73.7 | 157.30 | 209.54 | 77.9 | 163.16 | (3.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ___________ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Total comparable statistics include the operating performance for all 10 properties in the joint venture (determined on the same basis as our consolidated comparable hotel portfolio). See Notes to Financial Information for a discussion of the constant Euro and nominal Euro presentation.
| HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Schedule of Comparable Hotel Results (1) (unaudited, in millions, except hotel statistics) |
||||||||||||||||
| Quarter ended December 31, | Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
| Number of hotels | 88 | 88 | 88 | 88 | ||||||||||||
| Number of rooms | 49,376 | 49,376 | 49,376 | 49,376 | ||||||||||||
| Change in comparable hotel RevPAR - | ||||||||||||||||
| Constant US$ | 1.7 | % | — | 2.7 | % | — | ||||||||||
| Nominal US$ | 1.8 | % | — | 2.5 | % | — | ||||||||||
| Operating profit margin (2) | 11.2 | % | 10.8 | % | 12.6 | % | 11.8 | % | ||||||||
| Comparable hotel EBITDA margin (2) | 27.25 | % | 26.6 | % | 27.8 | % | 27.0 | % | ||||||||
| Food and beverage profit margin(2) | 31.7 | % | 31.4 | % | 30.3 | % | 29.2 | % | ||||||||
| Comparable hotel food and beverage profit margin(2) | 32.5 | % | 31.1 | % | 30.6 | % | 29.7 | % | ||||||||
| Comparable hotel revenues | ||||||||||||||||
| Room | $ | 776 | $ | 763 | $ | 3,194 | $ | 3,105 | ||||||||
| Food and beverage (3) | 369 | 366 | 1,430 | 1,406 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 72 | 65 | 284 | 265 | ||||||||||||
| Comparable hotel revenues (4) | 1,217 | 1,194 | 4,908 | 4,776 | ||||||||||||
| Comparable hotel expenses | ||||||||||||||||
| Room | 202 | 200 | 817 | 806 | ||||||||||||
| Food and beverage (5) | 249 | 252 | 993 | 989 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 24 | 30 | 99 | 122 | ||||||||||||
| Management fees, ground rent and other costs | 410 | 394 | 1,635 | 1,570 | ||||||||||||
| Comparable hotel expenses (6) | 885 | 876 | 3,544 | 3,487 | ||||||||||||
| Comparable hotel EBITDA | 332 | 318 | 1,364 | 1,289 | ||||||||||||
| Non-comparable hotel results, net (7) | 25 | 31 | 150 | 144 | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | (183 | ) | (180 | ) | (724 | ) | (708 | ) | ||||||||
| Interest expense | (38 | ) | (60 | ) | (154 | ) | (227 | ) | ||||||||
| Benefit (provision) for income taxes | 2 | 4 | (40 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||
| Gain on sale of property and corporate level income/expense |
(10 | ) | 52 | 175 | 76 | |||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 128 | $ | 165 | $ | 771 | $ | 565 | ||||||||
| ___________ | ||||||||||||||||
(1) See the Notes to Financial Information for a discussion of non-GAAP measures and the calculation of comparable hotel results. For additional information on comparable hotel EBITDA by market, see the supplemental information posted on our website.
(2) Profit margins are calculated by dividing the applicable operating profit by the related revenue amount. GAAP operating profit margins are calculated using amounts presented in the consolidated statements of operations. Comparable hotel margins are calculated using amounts presented in the above table.
(3) The reconciliation of total food and beverage sales per the consolidated statements of operations to the comparable food and beverage sales is as follows:
| Quarter ended December 31, | Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
| Food and beverage sales per the consolidated statements of operations |
$ | 416 | $ | 408 | $ | 1,599 | $ | 1,568 | ||||||||
| Non-comparable hotel food and beverage sales | (47 | ) | (42 | ) | (169 | ) | (162 | ) | ||||||||
| Comparable food and beverage sales | $ | 369 | $ | 366 | $ | 1,430 | $ | 1,406 | ||||||||
HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Schedule of
(unaudited, in millions, except hotel statistics)
(4) The reconciliation of total revenues per the consolidated statements of operations to the comparable hotel revenues is as follows:
| Quarter ended December 31, | Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
| Revenues per the consolidated statements of operations |
$ | 1,337 | $ | 1,326 | $ | 5,430 | $ | 5,350 | ||||||||
| Non-comparable hotel revenues | (120 | ) | (132 | ) | (522 | ) | (574 | ) | ||||||||
| Comparable hotel revenues | $ | 1,217 | $ | 1,194 | $ | 4,908 | $ | 4,776 | ||||||||
(5) The reconciliation of total food and beverage expenses per the consolidated statements of operations to the comparable food and beverage expenses is as follows:
| Quarter ended December 31, | Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
| Food and beverage expenses per the consolidated statements of operations |
$ | 284 | $ | 280 | $ | 1,114 | $ | 1,110 | ||||||||
| Non-comparable hotel food and beverage expenses | (35 | ) | (28 | ) | (121 | ) | (121 | ) | ||||||||
| Comparable food and beverage expenses | $ | 249 | $ | 252 | $ | 993 | $ | 989 | ||||||||
(6) The reconciliation of operating costs and expenses per the consolidated statements of operations to the comparable hotel expenses is as follows:
| Quarter ended December 31, | Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
| Operating costs and expenses per the consolidated statements of operations |
$ | 1,187 | $ | 1,183 | $ | 4,746 | $ | 4,719 | ||||||||
| Non-comparable hotel expenses | (95 | ) | (101 | ) | (372 | ) | (430 | ) | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | (183 | ) | (180 | ) | (724 | ) | (708 | ) | ||||||||
| Corporate and other expenses | (24 | ) | (26 | ) | (106 | ) | (94 | ) | ||||||||
| Comparable hotel expenses | $ | 885 | $ | 876 | $ | 3,544 | $ | 3,487 | ||||||||
(7) Non-comparable hotel results, net, includes the following items: (i) the results of operations of our non-comparable hotels and sold hotels, which operations are included in our consolidated statements of operations as continuing operations, (ii) gains on insurance settlements and business interruption proceeds, and (iii) the results of our office buildings.
| HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Other Financial Data (unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||||||
| Equity | ||||||||||||
| Common shares outstanding | 737.8 | 750.3 | ||||||||||
| Common shares outstanding assuming conversion of OP Units (1) | 746.5 | 759.7 | ||||||||||
| Preferred OP Units outstanding | .02 | .02 | ||||||||||
| Security pricing | ||||||||||||
| Common stock (2) | $ | 18.84 | $ | 15.34 | ||||||||
| Quarter ended | Year ended | |||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
| Dividends declared per common share | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | $ | .25 | $ | .85 | ||||||||
| 2015 | .20 | .80 | ||||||||||
| Debt | ||||||||||||
| Senior debt | Rate | Maturity date | December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | ||||||||
| Series Z | 6 | % | 10/2021 | $ | 297 | $ | 297 | |||||
| Series B | 5 1⁄4 | % | 3/2022 | 347 | 347 | |||||||
| Series C | 4 3⁄4 | % | 3/2023 | 446 | 445 | |||||||
| Series D | 3 3⁄4 | % | 10/2023 | 398 | 397 | |||||||
| Series E | 4 | % | 6/2025 | 496 | 495 | |||||||
| Series F | 4 1⁄2 | % | 2/2026 | 396 | 395 | |||||||
| 2014 Credit facility term loan | 1.9 | % | 6/2017 | 500 | 499 | |||||||
| 2015 Credit facility term loan | 1.9 | % | 9/2020 | 497 | 497 | |||||||
| Credit facility revolver (3) | 1.5 | % | 6/2018 | 209 | 295 | |||||||
| 3,586 | 3,667 | |||||||||||
| Mortgage debt and other | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage debt (non-recourse) | 3.4 | % | 11/22/17 | 63 | 200 | |||||||
| Total debt (4)(5) | $ | 3,649 | $ | 3,867 | ||||||||
| Percentage of fixed rate debt | 65 | % | 64 | % | ||||||||
| Weighted average interest rate | 3.8 | % | 3.7 | % | ||||||||
| Weighted average debt maturity | 5.2 years | 5.9 years | ||||||||||
| Forecast Full Year 2017 | ||||||||||||
| Forecast GAAP interest expense (6) | $ | 161 | ||||||||||
| Forecast cash interest, net (6) | $ | 154 | ||||||||||
| Forecast GAAP cash provided by operating activities (7) | $ | 1,221 | ||||||||||
| Forecast adjusted cash from operations (7) | $ | 933 | ||||||||||
| ___________ | ||||||||||||
(1) Each OP Unit is redeemable for cash or, at our option, for 1.021494 common shares of
(2) Share prices are the closing price as reported by the
(3) The interest rate shown is the weighted average rate of the outstanding credit facility at December 31, 2016.
(4) In accordance with GAAP, total debt includes the debt of entities that we consolidate, but of which we do not own 100%, and excludes the debt of entities that we do not consolidate, but of which we have a non-controlling ownership interest and record our investment therein under the equity method of accounting. As of December 31, 2016, our non-controlling partners’ share of consolidated debt is $16 million and our share of debt in unconsolidated investments is $392 million.
(5) Total debt as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 includes net discounts and deferred financing costs of
(6) Reflects 2017 forecast cash interest expense, net of debt extinguishment costs, as of the balance sheet date. The following chart reconciles GAAP interest expense to forecast cash interest expense for 2016 and Forecast Full Year 2017. See footnote (1) to the Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and NAREIT and Adjusted Funds From Operations per diluted share for 2017 Forecasts for full year forecast assumptions:
| Forecast Full Year 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||
| GAAP interest expense | $ | 161 | $ | 154 | ||||||
| Non-cash interest expense | (6 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||
| Change in accrued interest | (1 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||
| Cash interest full year | $ | 154 | $ | 144 | ||||||
See the Notes to Financial Information for a discussion of non-GAAP measures.
(7) The following chart reconciles Forecast Full Year 2017 GAAP cash provided by operating activities to forecast adjusted cash from operations:
| Forecast Full Year 2017 | ||||||
| Forecast GAAP cash provided by operating activities | $ | 1,221 | ||||
| Renewal and replacement expenditures | (288 | ) | ||||
| Forecast adjusted cash from operations | $ | 933 | ||||
See the Notes to Financial Information for a discussion of non-GAAP measures.
| HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA (1) (unaudited, in millions) |
||||||||||||||||
| Quarter ended December 31, | Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
| Net income (2) | $ | 128 | $ | 165 | $ | 771 | $ | 565 | ||||||||
| Interest expense | 38 | 60 | 154 | 227 | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 183 | 180 | 724 | 708 | ||||||||||||
| Income taxes | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | 40 | 9 | ||||||||||
| EBITDA (2) | 347 | 401 | 1,689 | 1,509 | ||||||||||||
| Gain on dispositions (3) | (8 | ) | (32 | ) | (250 | ) | (93 | ) | ||||||||
| (Gain) loss on property insurance settlement | — | 2 | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
| Acquisition costs | — | — | — | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Equity investment adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
| Equity in earnings of affiliates | (2 | ) | (45 | ) | (21 | ) | (76 | ) | ||||||||
| Pro rata Adjusted EBITDA of equity investments | 14 | 20 | 65 | 81 | ||||||||||||
| Consolidated partnership adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
| Pro rata Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non- controlling partners in other consolidated partnerships |
(3 | ) | (2 | ) | (11 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA (2) | $ | 348 | $ | 344 | $ | 1,471 | $ | 1,409 | ||||||||
| ___________ | ||||||||||||||||
(1) See the Notes to Financial Information for discussion of non-GAAP measures.
(2) Net Income, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO include a gain of
(3) Reflects the sale of ten hotels in 2016 and the sale of eight hotels in 2015.
| HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Reconciliation of Net Income to NAREIT and Adjusted Funds From Operations per Diluted Share (1) (unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||||||
| Quarter ended December 31, | Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
| Net income (2) | $ | 128 | $ | 165 | $ | 771 | $ | 565 | ||||||||
| Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | (9 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||
| Net income attributable to Host Inc. | 126 | 163 | 762 | 558 | ||||||||||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
| Gain on dispositions (3) | (8 | ) | (32 | ) | (250 | ) | (93 | ) | ||||||||
| Tax on dispositions | — | — | 9 | — | ||||||||||||
| (Gain) loss on property insurance settlement | — | 2 | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 182 | 179 | 720 | 704 | ||||||||||||
| Equity investment adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
| Equity in earnings of affiliates | (2 | ) | (45 | ) | (21 | ) | (76 | ) | ||||||||
| Pro rata FFO of equity investments | 10 | 13 | 48 | 55 | ||||||||||||
| Consolidated partnership adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
| FFO adjustment for non-controlling partnerships | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||
| FFO adjustments for non-controlling interests of Host L.P. |
(3 | ) | (1 | ) | (6 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||
| NAREIT FFO (2) | 304 | 278 | 1,257 | 1,134 | ||||||||||||
| Adjustments to NAREIT FFO: | ||||||||||||||||
| Loss on debt extinguishment | — | 20 | — | 45 | ||||||||||||
| Acquisition costs | — | — | — | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Adjusted FFO (2) | $ | 304 | $ | 298 | $ | 1,257 | $ | 1,180 | ||||||||
| For calculation on a per share basis: | ||||||||||||||||
| Adjustments for dilutive securities (4): | ||||||||||||||||
| Assuming conversion of Exchangeable Senior Debentures |
$ | — | $ | 1 | $ | — | $ | 22 | ||||||||
| Diluted NAREIT FFO | $ | 304 | $ | 279 | $ | 1,257 | $ | 1,156 | ||||||||
| Diluted Adjusted FFO | $ | 304 | $ | 299 | $ | 1,257 | $ | 1,202 | ||||||||
| Diluted weighted average shares outstanding - EPS | 738.6 | 761.9 | 743.7 | 752.9 | ||||||||||||
| Assuming conversion of Exchangeable Senior Debentures |
— | — | — | 25.4 | ||||||||||||
| Diluted weighted average shares outstanding - NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO |
738.6 | 761.9 | 743.7 | 778.3 | ||||||||||||
| NAREIT FFO per diluted share | $ | .41 | $ | .37 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 1.49 | ||||||||
| Adjusted FFO per diluted share | $ | .41 | $ | .39 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 1.54 | ||||||||
| ___________ | ||||||||||||||||
(1-3) Refer to the corresponding footnote on the Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA.
(4) Earnings per diluted share and NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO per diluted share are adjusted for the effects of dilutive securities. Dilutive securities may include shares granted under comprehensive stock plans, preferred OP units held by non-controlling partners, exchangeable debt securities and other non-controlling interests that have the option to convert their limited partnership interests to common OP units. No effect is shown for securities if they are anti-dilutive.
| HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and NAREIT and Adjusted Funds From Operations per Diluted Share for 2017 Forecasts (1) (unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts) |
||||||||
| Full Year 2017 | ||||||||
| Low-end of range |
High-end of range |
|||||||
| Net income | $ | 469 | $ | 539 | ||||
| Interest expense | 161 | 161 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 724 | 724 | ||||||
| Income taxes | 48 | 48 | ||||||
| EBITDA | 1,402 | 1,472 | ||||||
| Gain on dispositions | (15 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||
| Acquisition costs | 3 | 3 | ||||||
| Equity investment adjustments: | ||||||||
| Equity in earnings of affiliates | (24 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||
| Pro rata Adjusted EBITDA of equity investments | 65 | 65 | ||||||
| Consolidated partnership adjustments: | ||||||||
| Pro rata Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non-controlling partners in other consolidated partnerships | (11 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 1,420 | $ | 1,490 | ||||
| Full Year 2017 | ||||||||
| Low-end of range |
High-end of range |
|||||||
| Net income | $ | 469 | $ | 539 | ||||
| Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests | (5 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
| Net income attributable to Host Inc. | 464 | 533 | ||||||
| Gain on dispositions | (15 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 720 | 720 | ||||||
| Equity investment adjustments: | ||||||||
| Equity in earnings of affiliates | (24 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||
| Pro rata FFO of equity investments | 50 | 50 | ||||||
| Consolidated partnership adjustments: | ||||||||
| FFO adjustment for non-controlling partners in other consolidated partnerships | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
| FFO adjustment for non-controlling interests of Host LP | (8 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
| NAREIT FFO | 1,182 | 1,251 | ||||||
| Acquisition costs | 3 | 3 | ||||||
| Adjusted FFO | 1,185 | 1,254 | ||||||
| Diluted NAREIT FFO | 1,182 | 1,251 | ||||||
| Diluted Adjusted FFO | $ | 1,185 | $ | 1,254 | ||||
| Weighted average diluted shares - EPS | 739.0 | 739.0 | ||||||
| Weighted average diluted shares - NAREIT and Adjusted FFO | 739.0 | 739.0 | ||||||
| Earnings per diluted share | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.72 | ||||
| NAREIT FFO per diluted share | $ | 1.60 | $ | 1.69 | ||||
| Adjusted FFO per diluted share | $ | 1.60 | $ | 1.70 | ||||
| ___________ | ||||||||
(1) The forecasts are based on the below assumptions:
- Total comparable hotel RevPAR in constant US$ will increase 0.0% to 2.0% for the low and high end of the forecast range, which excludes the effect of changes in foreign currency. However, the effect of estimated changes in foreign currency has been reflected in the forecast of net income, EBITDA, earnings per diluted share and Adjusted FFO per diluted share.
- Comparable hotel EBITDA margins will decrease 80 basis points to 0 basis points for the low and high ends of the forecasted range, respectively.
- We expect to spend approximately $90 million to $115 million on ROI/redevelopment capital expenditures and approximately $275 million to
$300 million on renewal and replacement expenditures. - The above forecast reflects the
January 2017 disposition of theJW Marriott Desert Springs Resort & Spa and includes the acquisition of the Don CeSar onFebruary 16, 2017 , as well as approximately$200 million of unspecified acquisitions in 2017.
For a discussion of additional items that may affect forecasted results, see the Notes to Financial Information.
| HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Schedule of Comparable Hotel Results for 2017 Forecasts (1) (unaudited, in millions, except hotel statistics) |
||||||||
| Full Year 2017 | ||||||||
| Low-end of range |
High-end of range |
|||||||
| Operating profit margin under GAAP (2) | 12.0 | % | 13.1 | % | ||||
| Comparable hotel EBITDA margin (3) | 27.0 | % | 27.8 | % | ||||
| Comparable hotel sales | ||||||||
| Room | $ | 3,197 | $ | 3,260 | ||||
| Food and beverage | 1,413 | 1,434 | ||||||
| Other | 270 | 274 | ||||||
| Comparable hotel sales (4) | 4,880 | 4,968 | ||||||
| Comparable hotel expenses | ||||||||
| Rooms, food and beverage and other departmental costs | 1,896 | 1,906 | ||||||
| Management fees, ground rent and other costs | 1,666 | 1,680 | ||||||
| Comparable hotel expenses (5) | 3,562 | 3,586 | ||||||
| Comparable hotel EBITDA | 1,318 | 1,382 | ||||||
| Non-comparable hotel results, net | 148 | 154 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | (724 | ) | (724 | ) | ||||
| Interest expense | (161 | ) | (161 | ) | ||||
| Provision for income taxes | (48 | ) | (48 | ) | ||||
| Gain on sale of property and corporate level income/expense | (64 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||
| Net income | $ | 469 | $ | 539 | ||||
| ___________ | ||||||||
(1) Forecast comparable hotel results include 90 hotels that we have assumed will be classified as comparable as of December 31, 2017. See “Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics” in the Notes to Financial Information. No assurances can be made as to the hotels that will be in the comparable hotel set for 2017. Also, see the notes to the “Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and NAREIT and Adjusted Funds From Operations per Diluted Share for 2017 Forecasts” for other forecast assumptions and further discussion of our comparable hotel set.
(2) Operating profit margin under GAAP is calculated as the operating profit divided by the forecast total revenues per the consolidated statements of operations. See (4) below for forecast revenues.
(3) Comparable hotel EBITDA margin is calculated as the comparable hotel EBITDA divided by the comparable hotel sales per the table above.
(4) The reconciliation of forecast total revenues to the forecast comparable hotel sales is as follows (in millions):
| Low-end of range |
High-end of range |
|||||||
| Revenues | $ | 5,350 | $ | 5,444 | ||||
| Non-comparable hotel revenues | (470 | ) | (476 | ) | ||||
| Comparable hotel sales | $ | 4,880 | $ | 4,968 | ||||
(5) The reconciliation of forecast operating costs and expenses to the comparable hotel expenses is as follows (in millions):
| Low-end of range |
High-end of range |
||||||
| Operating costs and expenses | $ | 4,709 | $ | 4,733 | |||
| Non-comparable hotel and other expenses | (322 | ) | (322 | ) | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | (724 | ) | (724 | ) | |||
| Corporate and other expenses | (101 | ) | (101 | ) | |||
| Comparable hotel expenses | $ | 3,562 | $ | 3,586 | |||
FORECASTS
Our forecast of earnings per diluted share, NAREIT and Adjusted FFO per diluted share, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, comparable hotel EBITDA margins and cash from operations are forward-looking statements and are not guarantees of future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results and performance to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forecasts. Although we believe the expectations reflected in the forecasts are based upon reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that the expectations will be attained or that the results will not be materially different. Risks that may affect these assumptions and forecasts include the following: potential changes in overall economic outlook make it inherently difficult to forecast the level of RevPAR and margin growth; the amount and timing of acquisitions and dispositions of hotel properties is an estimate that can substantially affect financial results, including such items as net income, depreciation and gains on dispositions; the level of capital expenditures may change significantly, which will directly affect the level of depreciation expense and net income; the amount and timing of debt payments may change significantly based on market conditions, which will directly affect the level of interest expense and net income; the amount and timing of transactions involving shares of our common stock may change based on market conditions; and other risks and uncertainties associated with our business described herein and in our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K filed with the
APPLICATION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
During the first quarter of 2016, the Company adopted ASU No. 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, which included an amendment to the consolidation guidance that removed the presumption of control by a general partner in a limited partnership. As a result, the Company has deconsolidated the partnership which owns the
COMPARABLE HOTEL OPERATING STATISTICS
To facilitate a quarter-to-quarter comparison of our operations, we present certain operating statistics (i.e., RevPAR, average daily rate and average occupancy) and operating results (revenues, expenses, hotel EBITDA and associated margins) for the periods included in this report on a comparable hotel basis.
Because these statistics and operating results relate only to our hotel properties, they exclude results for our non-hotel properties and other real estate investments. We define our comparable hotels as properties:
(i) that are owned or leased by us and the operations of which are included in our consolidated results for the entirety of the reporting periods being compared; and
(ii) that have not sustained substantial property damage or business interruption, or undergone large-scale capital projects (as further defined below) during the reporting periods being compared.
The hotel business is capital-intensive and renovations are a regular part of the business. Generally, hotels under renovation remain comparable hotels. A large scale capital project that would cause a hotel to be excluded from our comparable hotel set is an extensive renovation of several core aspects of the hotel, such as rooms, meeting space, lobby, bars, restaurants and other public spaces. Both quantitative and qualitative factors are taken into consideration in determining if the renovation would cause a hotel to be removed from the comparable hotel set, including unusual or exceptional circumstances such as: a reduction or increase in room count, rebranding, a significant alteration of the business operations, or the closing of the hotel during the renovation.
We do not include an acquired hotel in our comparable hotel set until the operating results for that hotel have been included in our consolidated results for one full calendar year. For example, we acquired the Don CeSar in
Of the 96 hotels that we owned on
- The Denver Marriott Tech Center, removed in the first quarter of 2016 (business disruption due to extensive renovations, including conversion of 64 rooms to 41 suites, conversion of the concierge lounge into three meeting rooms, and the repositioning of the public space and food and beverage areas);
The Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport , removed in the first quarter of 2016 (business disruption due to extensive renovations, including all guestrooms and bathrooms, meeting space, the repositioning of the atrium into a new restaurant and lounge, and conversion of the existing restaurant to additional meeting space);The Camby Hotel (previously The Ritz-Carlton,Phoenix ), removed in the third quarter of 2015 (business interruption due to rebranding, including closure of the hotel inJuly 2015 for extensive renovation work);- The Logan (previously the Four Seasons Philadelphia), removed in the first quarter of 2015 (business interruption due to rebranding, including closure of the hotel in order to expedite renovation efforts);
Houston Airport Marriott at George Bush Intercontinental, removed in the first quarter of 2015 (business interruption due to complete repositioning of the hotel, including guest room renovations and the closure of two restaurants to create a new food and beverage outlet and lobby experience);Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina , removed in the first quarter of 2015 (business interruption due to the demolition of the existing conference center and construction of the new exhibit hall);- The Phoenician (acquired in
June 2015 and, beginning in second quarter 2016, business disruption due to extensive renovations, including all guestrooms and suites, a redesign of the lobby and public areas, renovation of pools, recreation areas and a restaurant and a re-configured spa and fitness center); and Axiom Hotel (acquired as thePowell Hotel inJanuary 2014 , then closed during 2015 for extensive renovations and reopened inJanuary 2016 ).
The operating results of 18 hotels disposed of in 2016 and 2015 are not included in comparable hotel results for the periods presented herein. These operations are also excluded from the hotel operating data for all owned hotels on pages 10 through 12.
Operating statistics for the non-comparable hotels listed above are included in the hotel operating data for all owned hotels. By definition, the RevPAR results for these properties are not comparable due to the reasons listed above, and, therefore, are not indicative of the overall trends for our portfolio. The operating results for the one hotel acquired in 2015 is included in the all owned hotel operating data on a pro forma basis, which includes operating results assuming it was owned as of January 1, 2015 and based on actual results obtained from the manager for periods prior to our ownership. For this hotel, since the year-over-year comparison includes periods prior to our ownership, the changes will not necessarily correspond to changes in our actual results. All owned hotel operating statistics are provided for completeness and to show the difference between our comparable hotel information (upon which we usually evaluate performance) and all of our hotels, including non-comparable hotels. Also, while they may not be illustrative of trends (as compared to comparable hotel operating statistics), changes in all owned hotel statistics will have an effect on our overall revenues. We also present all owned hotel statistics for our joint venture in
We evaluate the operating performance of our comparable hotels based on both market and property type. These divisions are generally consistent with groupings recognized in the lodging industry.
Our markets consist of the following:
Domestic
Boston –Greater Boston Metropolitan area;New York –Greater New York Metropolitan area, including northernNew Jersey ;Washington, D.C. – Metropolitan area, including theMaryland andVirginia suburbs;Atlanta –Atlanta Metropolitan area;Florida – All Florida locations;Chicago –Chicago Metropolitan area;Denver –Denver Metropolitan area;Houston –Houston Metropolitan area;Phoenix –Phoenix Metropolitan area, includingScottsdale ;Seattle –Seattle Metropolitan area;San Francisco –Greater San Francisco Metropolitan area, includingSan Jose ;Los Angeles –Greater Los Angeles area, includingOrange County ;San Diego –San Diego Metropolitan area;Hawaii – All Hawaii locations; and- Other – Select cities in
California ,Indiana ,Louisiana ,Minnesota ,Ohio ,Pennsylvania ,Tennessee andTexas .
International
Asia-Pacific –Australia ;Canada –Toronto andCalgary ; andLatin America –Brazil andMexico .
Our property types consist of the following:
- Urban – Hotels located in primary business districts of major cities;
- Suburban – Hotels located in office parks or smaller secondary markets;
- Resort – Hotels located in resort destinations such as
Arizona ,Florida ,Hawaii andSouthern California ; and - Airport – Hotels located at or near airports.
CONSTANT US$, NOMINAL US$ AND CONSTANT EUROS
Operating results denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the prevailing exchange rates on the date of the transaction, or monthly based on the weighted average exchange rate for the period. For comparative purposes, we also present the RevPAR results for the prior year assuming the results for our foreign operations were translated using the same exchange rates that were effective for the comparable periods in the current year, thereby eliminating the effect of currency fluctuation for the year-over-year comparisons. For the full year forecast results, we use the applicable forward currency curve (as published by
We also present RevPAR results for our joint venture in
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
Included in this press release are certain “non-GAAP financial measures,” which are measures of our historical or future financial performance that are not calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, within the meaning of applicable
NAREIT FFO and NAREIT FFO per Diluted Share
We present NAREIT FFO and NAREIT FFO per diluted share as non-GAAP measures of our performance in addition to our earnings per share (calculated in accordance with GAAP). We calculate NAREIT FFO per diluted share as our NAREIT FFO (defined as set forth below) for a given operating period, as adjusted for the effect of dilutive securities, divided by the number of fully diluted shares outstanding during such period, in accordance with NAREIT guidelines. NAREIT defines FFO as net income (calculated in accordance with GAAP) excluding gains and losses from sales of real estate, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, real estate-related depreciation, amortization and impairments and adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect our pro rata share of the FFO of those entities on the same basis.
We believe that NAREIT FFO per diluted share is a useful supplemental measure of our operating performance and that the presentation of NAREIT FFO per diluted share, when combined with the primary GAAP presentation of earnings per share, provides beneficial information to investors. By excluding the effect of real estate depreciation, amortization, impairments and gains and losses from sales of depreciable real estate, all of which are based on historical cost accounting and which may be of lesser significance in evaluating current performance, we believe that such measures can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and with other REITs, even though NAREIT FFO per diluted share does not represent an amount that accrues directly to holders of our common stock. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. As noted by NAREIT in its
Adjusted FFO per Diluted Share
We also present Adjusted FFO per diluted share when evaluating our performance because management believes that the exclusion of certain additional items described below provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our ongoing operating performance. Management historically has made the adjustments detailed below in evaluating our performance, in our annual budget process and for our compensation programs. We believe that the presentation of Adjusted FFO per diluted share, when combined with both the primary GAAP presentation of earnings per share and FFO per diluted share as defined by NAREIT, provides useful supplemental information that is beneficial to an investor’s complete understanding of our operating performance. We adjust NAREIT FFO per diluted share for the following items, which may occur in any period, and refer to this measure as Adjusted FFO per diluted share:
- Gains and Losses on the Extinguishment of Debt – We exclude the effect of finance charges and premiums associated with the extinguishment of debt, including the acceleration of the write-off of deferred financing costs associated with the original issuance of the debt being redeemed or retired and incremental interest expense incurred during the refinancing period. We also exclude the gains on debt repurchases and the original issuance costs associated with the retirement of preferred stock. We believe that these items are not reflective of our ongoing finance costs.
- Acquisition Costs – Under GAAP, costs associated with completed property acquisitions are expensed in the year incurred. We exclude the effect of these costs because we believe they are not reflective of the ongoing performance of the Company.
- Litigation Gains and Losses – We exclude the effect of gains or losses associated with litigation recorded under GAAP that we consider outside the ordinary course of business. We believe that including these items is not consistent with our ongoing operating performance.
In unusual circumstances, we may also adjust NAREIT FFO for gains or losses that management believes are not representative of the Company’s current operating performance. For example, in 2013, management excluded the $11 million gain from the eminent domain claim for land for which we received the cash proceeds in 2007, but, pending the resolution of certain contingencies, was not recognized until 2013. Typically, gains from the disposition of non-depreciable property are included in the determination of NAREIT and Adjusted FFO.
EBITDA
Earnings before Interest Expense, Income Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) is a commonly used measure of performance in many industries. Management believes EBITDA provides useful information to investors regarding our results of operations because it helps us and our investors evaluate the ongoing operating performance of our properties after removing the impact of the Company’s capital structure (primarily interest expense) and its asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization). Management also believes the use of EBITDA facilitates comparisons between us and other lodging REITs, hotel owners who are not REITs and other capital-intensive companies. Management uses EBITDA to evaluate property-level results and as one measure in determining the value of acquisitions and dispositions and, like FFO and Adjusted FFO per diluted share, is widely used by management in the annual budget process and for our compensation programs.
Adjusted EBITDA
Historically, management has adjusted EBITDA when evaluating the performance of
- Real Estate Transactions – We exclude the effect of gains and losses, including the amortization of deferred gains, recorded on the disposition or acquisition of depreciable assets and property insurance gains in our consolidated statement of operations because we believe that including them in Adjusted EBITDA is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our assets. In addition, material gains or losses from the depreciated book value of the disposed assets could be less important to investors given that the depreciated asset book value often does not reflect the market value of real estate assets as noted above.
- Equity Investment Adjustments – We exclude the equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates as presented in our consolidated statement of operations because it includes our pro rata portion of the depreciation, amortization and interest expense related to such investments, which are excluded from EBITDA. We include our pro rata share of the Adjusted EBITDA of our equity investments as we believe this reflects more accurately the performance of our investments. The pro rata Adjusted EBITDA of equity investments is defined as the EBITDA of our equity investments adjusted for any gains or losses on property transactions multiplied by our percentage ownership in the partnership or joint venture.
- Consolidated Partnership Adjustments – We deduct the non-controlling partners’ pro rata share of Adjusted EBITDA of our consolidated partnerships as this reflects the non-controlling owners’ interest in the EBITDA of our consolidated partnerships. The pro rata Adjusted EBITDA of non-controlling partners is defined as the EBITDA of our consolidated partnerships adjusted for any gains or losses on property transactions multiplied by the non-controlling partners’ percentage ownership in the partnership or joint venture.
- Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle – Infrequently, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board promulgates new accounting standards that require the consolidated statement of operations to reflect the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. We exclude these one-time adjustments because they do not reflect our actual performance for that period. - Impairment Losses – We exclude the effect of impairment expense recorded because we believe that including them in Adjusted EBITDA is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our remaining assets. In addition, we believe that impairment expense, which is based on historical cost book values, is similar to gains and losses on dispositions and depreciation expense, both of which are excluded from EBITDA.
- Acquisition Costs – Under GAAP, costs associated with completed property acquisitions are expensed in the year incurred. We exclude the effect of these costs because we believe they are not reflective of the ongoing performance of the company.
- Litigation Gains and Losses – We exclude the effect of gains or losses associated with litigation recorded under GAAP that we consider outside the ordinary course of business, which is consistent with the definition of Adjusted FFO that we adopted effective January 1, 2011. We believe that including these items is not consistent with our ongoing operating performance.
In unusual circumstances, we may also adjust EBITDA for gains or losses that management believes are not representative of the Company’s current operating performance. For example, in 2013, management excluded the $11 million gain from the eminent domain claim for land for which we received the cash proceeds in 2007, but, pending the resolution of certain contingencies, was not recognized until 2013. Typically, gains from the disposition of non-depreciable property are included in the determination of Adjusted EBITDA.
Limitations on the Use of NAREIT FFO per Diluted Share, Adjusted FFO per Diluted Share, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
We calculate NAREIT FFO per diluted share in accordance with standards established by NAREIT, which may not be comparable to measures calculated by other companies who do not use the NAREIT definition of FFO or do not calculate FFO per diluted share in accordance with NAREIT guidance. In addition, although FFO per diluted share is a useful measure when comparing our results to other REITs, it may not be helpful to investors when comparing us to non-REITs. We also calculate Adjusted FFO per diluted share, which is not in accordance with NAREIT guidance and may not be comparable to measures calculated by other REITs. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, as presented, may also not be comparable to measures calculated by other companies. This information should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating profit, cash from operations or any other operating performance measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. Cash expenditures for various long-term assets (such as renewal and replacement capital expenditures), interest expense (for EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA purposes only) and other items have been and will be made and are not reflected in the EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, NAREIT FFO per diluted share and Adjusted FFO per diluted share presentations. Management compensates for these limitations by separately considering the impact of these excluded items to the extent they are material to operating decisions or assessments of our operating performance. Our consolidated statement of operations and cash flows include interest expense, capital expenditures, and other excluded items, all of which should be considered when evaluating our performance, as well as the usefulness of our non-GAAP financial measures. Additionally, NAREIT FFO per diluted share, Adjusted FFO per diluted share, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of our liquidity or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. In addition, NAREIT FFO per diluted share and Adjusted FFO per diluted share do not measure, and should not be used as a measure of, amounts that accrue directly to stockholders’ benefit.
Similarly, Adjusted EBITDA, NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO per diluted share include adjustments for the pro rata share of our equity investments and non-controlling partners in consolidated partnerships. Our equity investments primarily consist of our approximate one-third interest in a European joint venture, a 25% interest in an Asian joint venture, a 67% ownership in a joint venture that owns a vacation ownership property in
We present certain operating results for our hotels, such as hotel revenues, expenses, EBITDA (and the related margin) and food and beverage adjusted profit (and the related margin), on a comparable hotel, or “same store,” basis as supplemental information for investors. Our comparable hotel results present operating results for hotels owned during the entirety of the periods being compared without giving effect to any acquisitions or dispositions, significant property damage or large scale capital improvements incurred during these periods. We present comparable hotel EBITDA to help us and our investors evaluate the ongoing operating performance of our comparable properties after removing the impact of the Company’s capital structure (primarily interest expense), and its asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization). Corporate-level costs and expenses are also removed to arrive at property-level results. We believe these property-level results provide investors with supplemental information into the ongoing operating performance of our comparable hotels. Comparable hotel results are presented both by region and for the Company’s comparable properties in the aggregate. We eliminate depreciation and amortization because, even though depreciation and amortization are property-level expenses, these non-cash expenses, which are based on historical cost accounting for real estate assets, implicitly assume that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. As noted earlier, because real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many real estate industry investors have considered presentation of historical cost accounting for operating results to be insufficient by themselves.
As a result of the elimination of corporate-level costs and expenses and depreciation and amortization, the comparable hotel operating results we present do not represent our total revenues, expenses, operating profit or net income and should not be used to evaluate our performance as a whole. Management compensates for these limitations by separately considering the impact of these excluded items to the extent they are material to operating decisions or assessments of our operating performance. Our consolidated statements of operations include such amounts, all of which should be considered by investors when evaluating our performance.
We present these hotel operating results on a comparable hotel basis because we believe that doing so provides investors and management with useful information for evaluating the period-to-period performance of our hotels and facilitates comparisons with other hotel REITs and hotel owners. In particular, these measures assist management and investors in distinguishing whether increases or decreases in revenues and/or expenses are due to growth or decline of operations at comparable hotels (which represent the vast majority of our portfolio) or from other factors, such as the effect of acquisitions or dispositions. While management believes that presentation of comparable hotel results is a “same store” supplemental measure that provides useful information in evaluating our ongoing performance, this measure is not used to allocate resources or to assess the operating performance of each of these hotels, as these decisions are based on data for individual hotels and are not based on comparable hotel results. For these reasons, we believe that comparable hotel operating results, when combined with the presentation of GAAP operating profit, revenues and expenses, provide useful information to investors and management.
Cash Interest Expense
We present Cash Interest Expense when evaluating our performance because management believes that the exclusion of certain items from interest expense as calculated under GAAP provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding payment obligations under our debt agreements. Management historically has made the adjustments detailed below to provide investors with a measure of the level of required cash expenditures associated with our outstanding debt without regard to cost associated with refinancing activity or non-cash expense. We believe that the presentation of Cash Interest Expense, when combined with the primary GAAP presentation, provides useful supplemental information related to our capital structure. We adjust GAAP interest expense for the following items, which may occur in any period, and refer to this measure as Cash Interest Expense:
- Amortization for deferred financing cost and original issue discounts/premiums – These costs represent cash payments or principal discounts or premiums made at the time of issuance and are amortized over the life of the debt. The amount and timing of these costs is dependent upon the level of financing activities and therefore, management does not believe they are reflective of the run-rate for interest expense.
- Debt extinguishment costs - These costs represent cash payments for premiums associated with prepayment of debt prior to maturity and the acceleration of previously unrecognized deferred financing costs. The amount and timing of these is dependent upon the level of financing activities and therefore, management does not believe they are reflective of the run-rate for interest expense.
- Changes in accrued interest – Represents the change in accrued interest on our balance sheet based on the timing of the payment of interest.
Adjusted Cash from Operations
We also present Adjusted Cash from Operations when evaluating our performance because management believes that the adjustment of certain additional items described below provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding the growth in cash flow from operations. We believe that the presentation of Adjusted Cash from Operations, when combined with the primary GAAP presentation of cash provided by operating activities from our consolidated statement of cash flows, provides useful supplemental information of cash available for acquisitions, capital expenditures, payment of dividends, stock repurchases and other corporate purposes. We adjust cash provided by operating activities for the following items, which may occur in any period, and refer to this measure as Adjusted Cash from Operations:
- Renewal and replacement capital expenditures (R&R) – Under the terms of our contracts with our managers we are required to provide cash for regular maintenance capital expenditures which we define as R&R. For this reason, we deduct these required cash expenditures in determining Adjusted Cash From Operations. These amounts are shown in cash from investing activities in our statement of cash flows.
- Cash debt extinguishment costs and incremental interest expense - These costs represent cash payments for premiums associated with prepayment of debt prior to maturity and cash interest expense during the period subsequent to the issuance of the new debt and prior to the repayment of the old debt. The amount and timing of these is dependent upon the level of financing activities and therefore, management does not believe they are reflective of the run-rate for interest expense.
Limitations on the Use of Cash Interest Expense and Adjusted Cash from Operations
We calculate Cash Interest Expense and Adjusted Cash from Operations as noted above. These measures should not be considered as an alternative to interest expense or cash provided by operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP. Additionally, these items should not be considered as a measure of our liquidity or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including the ability to make cash distributions, without consideration of the impact of the investing and financing cash requirements that are excluded from these calculations to the extent they are material to operating decisions.
Gregory J. Larson , Chief Financial Officer 240.744.5120Bret D.S. McLeod , Senior Vice President 240.744.5216 Gee Lingberg, Vice President 240.744.5275